True or False: Under comparative negligence, damages awarded vary depending on each state's statutes.

The statement is true because comparative negligence laws differ from state to state, leading to variations in how damages are awarded based on the degree of fault attributed to each party involved in an accident. Most states have established their own statutes that determine the specifics of how comparative negligence applies, including whether they follow a pure or modified version of the comparative negligence doctrine.

In pure comparative negligence states, a plaintiff can recover damages even if they are found to be partly at fault, with their recovery reduced by their percentage of fault. In modified comparative negligence states, a plaintiff may only recover damages if their fault is below a certain threshold, often set at 50% or 51%. This means that each state's laws will impact how much a plaintiff can receive in damages based on how negligence is apportioned between the parties involved.

Other options do not accurately capture the nuances of how comparative negligence operates across different jurisdictions.