Under which type of liability can a manufacturer be sued regardless of proof of fault?

The correct answer is based on the principle of strict liability, which holds manufacturers responsible for injuries caused by their products, regardless of whether there was any negligence or fault involved. This means that if a product is found to be defective and causes harm to a consumer, the manufacturer can be held liable simply because they produced and sold the product. This legal standard is intended to protect consumers by ensuring that those who create products are accountable for their safety.

Strict liability is particularly relevant in cases concerning defective products, where the focus is on the product's condition rather than the manufacturer's conduct. It emphasizes the responsibility of the manufacturer to ensure that their products are safe and free from defects that could cause injury.

In contrast, negligent liability requires proof that the manufacturer failed to act as a reasonable entity would under similar circumstances, establishing fault. Vicarious liability involves one party being held liable for the actions of another, typically in an employer-employee relationship, and comparative liability relates to determining fault and damages when multiple parties are involved. These concepts do not apply in the same way as strict liability, which emphasizes accountability for harm caused by defective products irrespective of fault.